[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 988: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Moscow' for 'MSD/4.0/DST' instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 988: getdate(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Moscow' for 'MSD/4.0/DST' instead
SolaraGuy.com • View topic - Headers HP for a auto?
Talk about aftermarket Toyota Solara Gen 1-1.5 upgrades.

Headers HP for a auto?

Postby Ragtop George » Thu May 08, 2003 7:36 am

My stock 0-60 time was about 9.5 seconds. Granted, this is with the heavier convertible and with about 8-9% loss due to altitude. Even so, your 7.5 second stock time sounds optimistic, I think 8 seconds is more likely. With the stock pulley, you should be up by 22-25% in acceleration, so working back from your 6.4 second time, 8 seconds sounds about right. The 2.75" pulley gained me about 10% in power, but at your lower altitude and higher temperatures in Texas, you may not gain as much due to detonation and the associated timing pullback by the engine computer. Still, if you have a sense of adventure, go for it!

George
2002 Solara Convertible Automatic
TRD Supercharger, 6 PSI pulley
Apexi WS exhaust, custom Y pipe
TRD RSB on "track" setting
Ragtop George
Regular SolaraGuy Member
Regular SolaraGuy Member
 
Posts: 130
Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 1:02 am
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada

Postby Flipside909 » Thu May 08, 2003 12:40 pm

xXsolaraXx wrote::o woa...35% increase in 0-60 with auto ???now i understand that u have an upgraded pulley...however with the stock pulley i only noticed about a .7-.9 sec. difference....before s/c my car did about 7.5 i think...now with the 4psi pulley(stock) it does about 6.4 or so...so with a 6 psi pulley ur saying ill be under 6 secs easy? IF thats true i cant wait for my car to be done i have a 6.2 psi pulley..hehe...by the way: FLIP...any comments? L8r moe :evilbat:


And you're getting these 0-60 times from what? Show us some real time slips instead of estimation and assumption from the butt dyno.
Image
www.clublexus.com

Solaraguy.com OG. ;)
Flipside909
SolaraGuy Supporter
SolaraGuy Supporter
 
Posts: 2725
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2001 5:00 pm
Location: California

Postby xXsolaraXx » Fri May 09, 2003 2:46 pm

ummm ok so i mite be a LIL off on the 0-60 sue me! hehe! i was just trying to make a point that 30% power time increase is almost impossible for the s/c on an auto...am i right? L8r moe :evilbat:
xXsolaraXx
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 804
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 12:18 pm
Location: Euless, TX
Previous

Return to Aftermarket Gen1 and 1.5

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests