[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 988: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Moscow' for 'MSD/4.0/DST' instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 988: getdate(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Moscow' for 'MSD/4.0/DST' instead
SolaraGuy.com • View topic - difference between 04 Solara V6 and the V6 in RX330 & Si
Stock talk about the Generation 2 and 2.5 Toyota Solara which was released in 2004-2007

difference between 04 Solara V6 and the V6 in RX330 & Si

difference between 04 Solara V6 and the V6 in RX330 & Si

Postby angelo » Sun Oct 19, 2003 3:33 pm

the same engine is rated 225 hp in (Solara, ES330) and 330 hp in (Sienna, RX330) - is it just a chip programming?
angelo
Regular SolaraGuy Member
Regular SolaraGuy Member
 
Posts: 127
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 1:22 pm
Location: Montreal, QC

Postby TW85 » Sun Oct 19, 2003 3:56 pm

You may want to correct that to 230 HP. :wink:
TW85
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 527
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 1:21 pm

Postby geminimouse » Sun Oct 19, 2003 4:03 pm

Where did u see that the sienna and rx has 330 hp? It's listed as 230 hp. (oops)
http://www.toyota.com/vehicles/2004/sienna/specs.html
http://www.lexus.com/models/rx/specifications.html
Last edited by geminimouse on Sun Oct 19, 2003 5:34 pm, edited 2 times in total.
08 Accord Coupe
99 Solara Sold on 7/7/07
geminimouse
SolaraGuy Supporter
SolaraGuy Supporter
 
Posts: 1534
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 2:20 am
Location: Elkridge, MD

Postby TW85 » Sun Oct 19, 2003 5:28 pm

The Solara V6 has 225 HP.
TW85
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 527
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 1:21 pm

Re: difference between 04 Solara V6 and the V6 in RX330 &

Postby angelo » Mon Oct 20, 2003 3:44 am

angelo wrote:the same engine is rated 225 hp in (Solara, ES330) and 330 hp in (Sienna, RX330) - is it just a chip programming?


Yes, I mean 230 hp :( , there's still a 5 hp difference...
angelo
Regular SolaraGuy Member
Regular SolaraGuy Member
 
Posts: 127
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 1:22 pm
Location: Montreal, QC

ours are lighter

Postby bigpow » Mon Oct 20, 2003 12:42 pm

I'd take the 5HP less with less weight too.
Anyone got the weight of Sienna/RX? They must weight more, right?
:o

I'm thinking of CAI mod (+10HP)?
bigpow
Regular SolaraGuy Member
Regular SolaraGuy Member
 
Posts: 198
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 8:02 pm

Postby TW85 » Mon Oct 20, 2003 1:39 pm

Solara SLE V6 - 3,439 lbs.

Sienna XLE FWD - 4,165 lbs.

RX 330 FWD - 3,860 lbs.
TW85
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 527
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 1:21 pm

what would be cool

Postby bigpow » Tue Oct 21, 2003 10:47 pm

You know what would be cool?
Put the 3.3L V6 engine into a Corolla/Celica ~2000lbs -> instant rocket car
bigpow
Regular SolaraGuy Member
Regular SolaraGuy Member
 
Posts: 198
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 8:02 pm

Postby HKSV6SLE » Wed Oct 22, 2003 12:05 am

for one thing..putting a v6 into a car like the celica would not make sense cuz it would make the car very heavy in front, which is bad enuff cuz its a front wheel drive car and im pretty sure that most of the weight of the car is in the front...could it be done? yeaa....but....seems weird...
2008 LEXUS IS350 SGM
www.lexusnet.com
HKSV6SLE
SolaraGuy Supporter
SolaraGuy Supporter
 
Posts: 3220
Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2003 3:24 am
Location: So Cal.

Postby Hammerli » Sat Nov 29, 2003 4:54 pm

Generally most variances in power in models powered by the same engine are due to different intake/exhaust routing. It is generally easier in an SUV to make a straighter exhaust than in a sporty coupe. Also intake routing is often different, which can make a few hp difference. Another possibility is that the SUV/van engine is tuned for more torque at a lower RPM to aid in acceleration, which will affect the rest of the powerband as well.

As far as the V6 in the Celica, no thanks. The 61/39 weight distribution is already bad enough, the last thing I want is more understeer.
2000 Celica GT-S 6 speed
2004 Solara SE Sport V6
Black Pearl Emblems
Blizzak WS-50 215/55/17
Hammerli
Just Licensed SolaraGuy
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2003 5:19 pm
Location: SW Michigan

Postby Guest » Tue Dec 02, 2003 7:08 am

is not put it on MR2... but too bad all new V6 are auto..
Guest
 

Return to Stock Gen 2 and 2.5

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests