[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 988: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Moscow' for 'MSD/4.0/DST' instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 988: getdate(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Moscow' for 'MSD/4.0/DST' instead
SolaraGuy.com • View topic - Automatic Transmission Cooler
Talk about aftermarket Toyota Solara Gen 1-1.5 upgrades.

Automatic Transmission Cooler

Postby Paladin06Greg » Sun Aug 08, 2004 3:22 pm

Cooling the automatic transmission is not only a good idea for extending the life of your transmission but a cooler transmission means less possibility of slippage which equates to performance.

Now if you're running your SC with the EBC disconnected, like I have now, the cooler is essential in keeping the transmission alive and your car running at its peak.

Hope that helps. I'm sure some really smart guy will drop by for many more technical details.

gnaw_divad wrote:Hey just curious as to how neccessary the ATC is for the Solara. It seems almost all the charged auto solaras have it on this forum?

-David
Paladin06Greg
Torqued Solara
Torqued Solara
 
Posts: 3056
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 2:19 pm
Location: East Valley AZ, USA

Postby bassthrive » Sun Aug 08, 2004 3:40 pm

Does this cooler work alongside the stock atf cooler (a.k.a. radiator) or do you completely bypass the radiator hookups and run the atf cooler alone?

- Paul
- Paul

y2k(1MZ)dWp
cpe mafci / apexi ws / tein s-tech + tokico / trd rsb
bassthrive
SolaraGuy Marklar
SolaraGuy Marklar
 
Posts: 1778
Joined: Sun Jun 02, 2002 8:39 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Postby impactX » Sun Aug 08, 2004 3:46 pm

bassthrive wrote:Does this cooler work alongside the stock atf cooler (a.k.a. radiator) or do you completely bypass the radiator hookups and run the atf cooler alone?

- Paul


It can go before or after the radiator. I chose to put it after the radiator and then return the fluid to the tranny.
impactX
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 958
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 9:06 pm

Postby Paladin06Greg » Sun Aug 08, 2004 3:51 pm

The recommended install for my cooler was tranny to cooler then to radiator. It was stated that you should bypass the radiator ONLY if there was a cooling problem in the radiator system.

To each his own. My cooler is placed 5 inches forward of my radiator. That way I'm sure it's in clean air. 8)
Paladin06Greg
Torqued Solara
Torqued Solara
 
Posts: 3056
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 2:19 pm
Location: East Valley AZ, USA

Postby bassthrive » Sun Aug 08, 2004 8:28 pm

For mine I plan hook up the flow...

tranny >>> radiator >>> cooler >>> back to tranny

Better heat exchanging I think.

- Paul
- Paul

y2k(1MZ)dWp
cpe mafci / apexi ws / tein s-tech + tokico / trd rsb
bassthrive
SolaraGuy Marklar
SolaraGuy Marklar
 
Posts: 1778
Joined: Sun Jun 02, 2002 8:39 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Postby Vi3tT3kNiqz » Sun Aug 08, 2004 9:55 pm

is there any purpose to having a tranny cooler on a non s/c solara?
Vi3tT3kNiqz
SolaraGuy Street Racer
SolaraGuy Street Racer
 
Posts: 1006
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:53 pm
Location: San Jose, CA

Postby Yanks0114 » Sun Aug 08, 2004 9:58 pm

Vi3tT3kNiqz wrote:is there any purpose to having a tranny cooler on a non s/c solara?


Not really. It depends on your driving style.

Its an inexpensive mod (~50) to help preserve your tranny, but its overkill unless you really abuse your car or have some added power.
Yanks0114
SolaraGuy Moderator
SolaraGuy Moderator
 
Posts: 4756
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 12:01 am

Postby prowlerartist » Sun Aug 08, 2004 10:33 pm

rippmods also sells them
prowlerartist
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 378
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 8:13 pm
Location: San Francisco/Sacramento CA

Postby Vi3tT3kNiqz » Sun Aug 08, 2004 10:43 pm

Not really. It depends on your driving style.

Its an inexpensive mod (~50) to help preserve your tranny, but its overkill unless you really abuse your car or have some added power.


sorry but what do u mean by overkill?
Vi3tT3kNiqz
SolaraGuy Street Racer
SolaraGuy Street Racer
 
Posts: 1006
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:53 pm
Location: San Jose, CA

Postby krawzyazn » Sun Aug 08, 2004 11:49 pm

Yanks0114 wrote:
Vi3tT3kNiqz wrote:is there any purpose to having a tranny cooler on a non s/c solara?


Not really. It depends on your driving style.

Its an inexpensive mod (~50) to help preserve your tranny, but its overkill unless you really abuse your car or have some added power.
thats me over kill red line all the time lol
2002 2AZ-FE SILVER Toyota Solara
<B>FIRST 2AZ Gen 1.5 Solara with Headers!!!</b>
Image

<B>http://WWW.Obamastinks.net</B>
User avatar
krawzyazn
SolaraGuy Hall of Famer
SolaraGuy Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 8335
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2003 8:28 am
Location: Cerritos, CA

Postby JoeB » Mon Aug 09, 2004 4:30 am

Greg, when you hooked up your cooler, you physically have the cooler placed in front of the radiator right? I think you were referring to the physical layout when you said "cooler then to radiator". Do you have the flow setup tranny to radiator to cooler then back to tranny? That would be the recommended way. Some people bypass the ratiator for cooling and only hook it up to the cooler, that is what they are referring to in the instructions. I've never seen any recommendations to go from tranny-radiator-cooler-tranny as far as fluid flow. I just installed mine this weekend. I used the Hayden 678. It's a stacked plate and second to the largest in their line-up rated for class C motor homes and towing up to 5000 lbs. They have the 679 that is a little better but even larger physically. The 678 sounded like over-kill already. -JoeB
Please stop by and rate my ride.
http://www.cardomain.com/id/jbailer
Image
JoeB
SolaraGuy Street Racer
SolaraGuy Street Racer
 
Posts: 1166
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2002 6:58 pm
Location: Myersville, MD

Postby Paladin06Greg » Mon Aug 09, 2004 1:39 pm

JoeB,

I got the HEAVY DUTY HAYDEN 1405 TRANSMISSION OIL COOLER 405. Figure A shows the return line from the radiator to the Hayden cooler, then the Hayden cooler to the transmission. That's how my install is. The Hayden cooler is in front of the Air conditioner condensor as this position provides 100% efficiency.

Your thoughts?


JoeB wrote:Greg, when you hooked up your cooler, you physically have the cooler placed in front of the radiator right? I think you were referring to the physical layout when you said "cooler then to radiator". Do you have the flow setup tranny to radiator to cooler then back to tranny? That would be the recommended way. Some people bypass the ratiator for cooling and only hook it up to the cooler, that is what they are referring to in the instructions. I've never seen any recommendations to go from tranny-radiator-cooler-tranny as far as fluid flow. I just installed mine this weekend. I used the Hayden 678. It's a stacked plate and second to the largest in their line-up rated for class C motor homes and towing up to 5000 lbs. They have the 679 that is a little better but even larger physically. The 678 sounded like over-kill already. -JoeB
Paladin06Greg
Torqued Solara
Torqued Solara
 
Posts: 3056
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 2:19 pm
Location: East Valley AZ, USA

Postby JoeB » Mon Aug 09, 2004 4:19 pm

Greg, I don't see 1405 listed in Hayden's catalog. If it's the 405, I see that listed as part of Hayden's Ultra-Cool product line up. The Ultra-Cool are the tube & fin coolers. I'm not a big fan of them because they are less efficient. Taking more space for the same amount of cooling than the stacked plate coolers. Also, the stacked plate coolers are more durable. Especially with the cooler being right up front with no protection. Rocks fly up, bend up the fins and it's even less efficient.

If it is in the "Heavy Duty Oil Coolrs" line, I think those are better. Still tube & fin but I think they are all multi-pass and more efficient than the Ultra-Cools but I still like the idea of the stacked plate better. As far as connections, for best cooling I would want it to go to the radiator first. It will cool it off some but taking it through the aux cooler afterwards will cool it more. If they show it listed aux cooler then the radiator, they might be doing that because of extreme cold weather applications. In the extreme cold the warmth of the water going through the radiator will regulate the temperature of the transmission fluid.

Lots of performance nuts bypass the radiator all together and just go to the cooler. The thought here is it's much more efficient than the radiator and you get the warm fluid out of the tranny, into the cooler and back into the tranny quicker. -JoeB
Please stop by and rate my ride.
http://www.cardomain.com/id/jbailer
Image
JoeB
SolaraGuy Street Racer
SolaraGuy Street Racer
 
Posts: 1166
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2002 6:58 pm
Location: Myersville, MD

Postby Paladin06Greg » Mon Aug 09, 2004 5:21 pm

You are correct it reads 1405 - 405 Heavy Duty cooler.

It is tube and fin. I'm not to concerned as I have the wire mesh in my lower grill opening. No stones or rocks will pas through there.

Thanks for all the info..



.
JoeB wrote:Greg, I don't see 1405 listed in Hayden's catalog. If it's the 405, I see that listed as part of Hayden's Ultra-Cool product line up. The Ultra-Cool are the tube & fin coolers. I'm not a big fan of them because they are less efficient. Taking more space for the same amount of cooling than the stacked plate coolers. Also, the stacked plate coolers are more durable. Especially with the cooler being right up front with no protection. Rocks fly up, bend up the fins and it's even less efficient.

If it is in the "Heavy Duty Oil Coolrs" line, I think those are better. Still tube & fin but I think they are all multi-pass and more efficient than the Ultra-Cools but I still like the idea of the stacked plate better. As far as connections, for best cooling I would want it to go to the radiator first. It will cool it off some but taking it through the aux cooler afterwards will cool it more. If they show it listed aux cooler then the radiator, they might be doing that because of extreme cold weather applications. In the extreme cold the warmth of the water going through the radiator will regulate the temperature of the transmission fluid.

Lots of performance nuts bypass the radiator all together and just go to the cooler. The thought here is it's much more efficient than the radiator and you get the warm fluid out of the tranny, into the cooler and back into the tranny quicker. -JoeB
Paladin06Greg
Torqued Solara
Torqued Solara
 
Posts: 3056
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 2:19 pm
Location: East Valley AZ, USA

Postby noodlerooney » Tue Sep 07, 2004 5:18 pm

IMHO the stacked plate design is superior to the tube/fin.
1) SP design allow bypass of fluid when cold. As fluid heats up, more is allowed into unit for cooling.
TF always cooling.
2) SP has no pressure drop as fluid can bypass when viscous(cold).
TF has pressure drop when fluid cold.
3) SP a more rugged/compact unit.
4) SP cheaper price.
I must of researched this for a month before I purchased my B&M stacked plate oil cooler (16KGVW).
I ran the lines on the side of the radiator with foam pipe insulation as protection. I did not like the idea of exposing them to a hangup by going under the radiator.
I used to average tranny fluid temps measured just before the cooler at 210F, but now I usually see 165F (sweet).
Next would be to install a dedicated fan with auto on/off for it, a 6-7 inch should do it.
2000 SLE Flame Red Metallic, Charcoal Leather Interior, Loaded
15,001 miles, Garage Queen
noodlerooney
SolaraGuy Supporter
SolaraGuy Supporter
 
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 9:26 am
Location: Coventry, Worst Rhodes Island
PreviousNext

Return to Aftermarket Gen1 and 1.5

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests