[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 988: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Moscow' for 'MSD/4.0/DST' instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 988: getdate(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Moscow' for 'MSD/4.0/DST' instead
SolaraGuy.com • View topic - Interesting Chart
Stock talk about the Generation 1 and 1.5 Toyota Solara which were produced from 1999 to 2003.

Interesting Chart

Interesting Chart

Postby DDH1313 » Wed Nov 12, 2003 8:49 pm

Image
Image

Credit for these graphs go to SteVTEC of maxima.org, but as a 1MZ-FE owner I found the stats very interesting.
1999 Solara V6 SLE
DDH1313
Just Licensed SolaraGuy
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 3:54 pm

Postby TadS » Thu Nov 13, 2003 2:10 am

Wow you can really see that VTEC kicking in on the top. I wonder how a VVT-i V6 would compare...any of you Gen 2 guys got graphs yet?
Let's just pretend I didn't grow up, or you're going to be terribly disappointed.
User avatar
TadS
SolaraGuy Supporter
SolaraGuy Supporter
 
Posts: 1447
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2002 8:05 pm
Location: The Hoosier State

Postby Grazi07 » Thu Nov 13, 2003 6:25 am

Make sure to look at the description of the engines..... the J30A1 they test is modded slightly, so follow the dotted line for true info. Interesting how the VTEC doesn't add much more, just 500 rpm later....
Team Nex-Gen: The new breed of speed!

Check us out at www.teamnexgen.net
Grazi07
SolaraGuy UConn Guy
SolaraGuy UConn Guy
 
Posts: 918
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 9:11 am
Location: Scituate, RI

Postby TadS » Thu Nov 13, 2003 6:38 am

That's true, but still it does add a bit. I am interested in VVT-i vs. VTEC comparison b/ I feel like they represent the most advanced level of competition between Honduh and Toyota :). It's pretty cool how much more power the Toyota motor is making through most of the power band :D.
Let's just pretend I didn't grow up, or you're going to be terribly disappointed.
User avatar
TadS
SolaraGuy Supporter
SolaraGuy Supporter
 
Posts: 1447
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2002 8:05 pm
Location: The Hoosier State

Postby Jackass-Jeff » Thu Nov 13, 2003 6:53 am

VTEC (Valve Timing Electronic Control I believe) is like a digital signal. On and off. It kicks in at a high rpm by opening up the cams more. It has a ridiculous gain but damages the overall performance (torque). EX: S2000. 10k redline I think, but daily driving needs around 4-5k rpm. The engine only lasts around 100,000 miles... hahaha GG super high compression.

VVT-i (Variable Valve Timing w/ Intelligence) is a continuous system that is ALWAYS changing the ports to produce the best torque / power curve possible but has the least max gain. It just has the greatest overall gain. Due to the gains, you can drive at lower RPMs while getting enough power to move yo' arse around and save gas and also extending engine life.

i-VTEC (VTEC + Intelligence) changes the whole thing by adding a step system between "kick ins". Instead of it only kicking in at 6K RPM, it will kick in once at 4000 and once at 6000 producing a double VTEC like feeling.

VVTL-i (VVT w/ Lift and Intelligence) has the same effects as VVT-i BUT BUT BUT BUT BUT BUT BUT the L stands for LIFT. The lift happens at high RPMs also to produce the VTEC like gain for horsepower. This will be the greatest racing technology due to the low end power gain and the high end horsepower gain. I think this is only found in the Celica GTS, Matrix XRS, and the upcoming Corolla XRS. It's the technology for sportier cars while VVT-i will probably remain the standard w/ "normal" sedans and such.
1GR-FE ftw!
Jackass-Jeff
SolaraGuy Hall of Famer
SolaraGuy Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 6224
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 12:54 pm

Postby SKYravefever » Thu Nov 13, 2003 8:50 am

Did anyone notice that the torque figure for the 1MZ's abnormally high (~190 lb/ft)?
SKYravefever
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 285
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 11:15 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Postby TadS » Thu Nov 13, 2003 9:10 am

Xravexboix's post should be part of the FAQ :) Great information man.
Let's just pretend I didn't grow up, or you're going to be terribly disappointed.
User avatar
TadS
SolaraGuy Supporter
SolaraGuy Supporter
 
Posts: 1447
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2002 8:05 pm
Location: The Hoosier State

Postby Jai_Jai_Binks » Thu Nov 13, 2003 9:45 am

SKYravefever wrote:Did anyone notice that the torque figure for the 1MZ's abnormally high (~190 lb/ft)?


There is a reason we all call our imz's a torque engine!
User avatar
Jai_Jai_Binks
Desi SolaraGuy
Desi SolaraGuy
 
Posts: 5751
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2002 11:59 am
Location: Friendswood, TX

Postby Yanks0114 » Thu Nov 13, 2003 1:37 pm

TadS wrote:Xravexboix's post should be part of the FAQ :) Great information man.


I added it, not like anyone is ever going to read it though :(
Yanks0114
SolaraGuy Moderator
SolaraGuy Moderator
 
Posts: 4756
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 12:01 am

Postby Guest » Thu Nov 13, 2003 2:23 pm

It also should be noted that the 1MZ was run on 93 octane. From my own personal experience with a 95 camry V6 and now my SLE V6 the 1MZ is a completely different engine on premium. It even dominates Nissan's VQ on torque which is admired as one of the best V6 engines ever made... "5 year Wards Best Engine i think".
Guest
 

Postby hari-bhari » Fri Nov 14, 2003 6:18 am

gotta love toyota torque. i look at the torque of an engine now before i look at hp. good low-end torque gets you around for daily driving, which for me is MUCH more important than having the high end horsepower. for example, in our avalon that has the 1mz, i only have to go up to about 2200 rpm in most cases to get it moving at decent speeds. when i drove a v6 2001 accord though, i noticed i was still taking it up to about 3000 rpm to get the same speed. it all makes sense now after lookin at the torque curve. go toyota 8)
hari-bhari
SolaraGuy Semi-Pro Racer
SolaraGuy Semi-Pro Racer
 
Posts: 2148
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2003 6:38 pm

Postby Yanks0114 » Fri Nov 14, 2003 12:16 pm

Anonymous wrote:It also should be noted that the 1MZ was run on 93 octane. From my own personal experience with a 95 camry V6 and now my SLE V6 the 1MZ is a completely different engine on premium. It even dominates Nissan's VQ on torque which is admired as one of the best V6 engines ever made... "5 year Wards Best Engine i think".


The VQ engine that was tested is not the new engine that nissan was using. This is a 3.0L engine, their new engine is 3.5L
Yanks0114
SolaraGuy Moderator
SolaraGuy Moderator
 
Posts: 4756
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 12:01 am

Postby SKYravefever » Sat Nov 15, 2003 4:19 pm

I'm well aware of how much low end torque there is on the 1MZ. My post was to point out if there were any errors in the graph. Non vvti 1mz's were rated @ 209lb/ft @ 4400. I may have recalled incorrectly (given the graph's not there any more), but it hit ~190lb/ft @ around 3500rpm. That's pretty darn close to the 209lb/ft. :o
SKYravefever
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 285
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 11:15 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Postby adam2562 » Sun Nov 16, 2003 6:38 pm

correction VTEC and VVTL-I use oil pressure to change the lift :D
Adam - 99 V6 5spd 165k -SOLD
adam2562
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 686
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am
Location: North Potomac, Maryland

Return to Stock Gen 1 and 1.5

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests