[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 988: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Moscow' for 'MSD/4.0/DST' instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 988: getdate(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Moscow' for 'MSD/4.0/DST' instead
SolaraGuy.com • View topic - DRL with HIDs
Stock talk about the Generation 1 and 1.5 Toyota Solara which were produced from 1999 to 2003.

DRL with HIDs

Correction

Postby SKYravefever » Tue Oct 22, 2002 1:07 am

yanks0114 wrote:Also 6000k provides the most effective light because of its color. It is a real clean illumination. The 4300k lights may be brighter on the facts sheet, but its just that the blue hue appeals more to the eye. I have driven in both 4000k cars and 6000k cars. I have also been in a car with 9000k head lights and it just seems that 6000k are brighter.


It's actually the opposite, 6000K provides less effective light than 4300K lights due to it's wavelengths on the visual light spectrum. Yes, blue appeals more to the eye, but that's only good if you are looking directly at the blue lamp. However, when we are driving, we use headlamps to illuminate the road and the illuminated parts of the road is caused by the light reflecting off those surfaces.

The blue hue is actually absorbed by objects that it shines on, thus less light is reflected off objects. This ultimately leads to poor illumination, and reduced vision at night.

This concept is identical to why blue halogen lights are terrible compared to the dingy OEM halogens, given the same wattage.

BTW, I stand corrected as I forgot about Xenarc as a street-legal, DOT-approved HID system.
SKYravefever
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 285
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 11:15 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

correction

Postby SKYravefever » Tue Oct 22, 2002 1:10 am

yanks0114 wrote:Also 6000k provides the most effective light because of its color. It is a real clean illumination. The 4300k lights may be brighter on the facts sheet, but its just that the blue hue appeals more to the eye. I have driven in both 4000k cars and 6000k cars. I have also been in a car with 9000k head lights and it just seems that 6000k are brighter.


It's actually the opposite, 6000K provides less effective light than 4300K lights due to it's wavelengths on the visual light spectrum. Yes, blue appeals more to the eye, but that's only good if you are looking directly at the blue lamp. However, when we are driving, we use headlamps to illuminate the road and the illuminated parts of the road is caused by the light reflecting off those surfaces.

The blue hue is actually absorbed by objects that it shines on, thus less light is reflected off objects. This ultimately leads to poor illumination, and reduced vision at night.

This concept is identical to why blue halogen lights are terrible compared to the dingy OEM halogens, given the same wattage.

BTW, I stand corrected as I forgot about Xenarc as a street-legal, DOT-approved HID system.
SKYravefever
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 285
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 11:15 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Correction

Postby SKYravefever » Tue Oct 22, 2002 1:13 am

yanks0114 wrote:Also 6000k provides the most effective light because of its color. It is a real clean illumination. The 4300k lights may be brighter on the facts sheet, but its just that the blue hue appeals more to the eye. I have driven in both 4000k cars and 6000k cars. I have also been in a car with 9000k head lights and it just seems that 6000k are brighter.


It's actually the opposite, 6000K provides less effective light than 4300K lights due to it's wavelengths on the visual light spectrum. Yes, blue appeals more to the eye, but that's only good if you are looking directly at the blue lamp. However, when we are driving, we use headlamps to illuminate the road and the illuminated parts of the road is caused by the light reflecting off those surfaces.

The blue hue is actually absorbed by objects that it shines on, thus less light is reflected off objects. This ultimately leads to poor illumination, and reduced vision at night.

This concept is identical to why blue halogen lights are terrible compared to the dingy OEM halogens, given the same wattage.

BTW, I stand corrected as I forgot about Xenarc as a street-legal, DOT-approved HID system.
SKYravefever
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 285
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 11:15 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Oi!

Postby SKYravefever » Tue Oct 22, 2002 1:14 am

Sorry for the triple post. I got an timeout error message "smtp: 101" after I hit submit.
SKYravefever
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 285
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 11:15 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Postby SKYravefever » Tue Oct 22, 2002 1:40 am

yanks0114 wrote:Also 6000k provides the most effective light because of its color. It is a real clean illumination. The 4300k lights may be brighter on the facts sheet, but its just that the blue hue appeals more to the eye. I have driven in both 4000k cars and 6000k cars. I have also been in a car with 9000k head lights and it just seems that 6000k are brighter.


It may have to do with the actual headlamps amongst those cars that made it look like 6000K capsule is brighter. Poor optics on the car with 4300K may have contributed to it looking not as bright.

I agree blue hue appeals more to the eye, however, we are not looking directly into the 6000K capsule when we're driving. Our eyes can easily be fooled into thinking something is brighter due to its color.

Under identical conditions, ~6000K (blue light) will never be brighter than ~4300K (White light), on fact sheets as well as reality. Just think about 55W blue halogen bulbs. It has the same wattage as OEM halogen bulbs (55W), but it does a terrible job at illuminating the road.

Here is a good resource on HIDs that I came across:
http://faq.auto.light.tripod.com/general-faq.htm
SKYravefever
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 285
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 11:15 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Postby Flipside909 » Fri Oct 25, 2002 1:58 pm

yanks0114 wrote:Sylvania makes a DOT approved kit.

http://www.brightheadlights-hid.com/Xen ... s-Kits.htm
[/quote]

DOT doesn't approve anything. DOT makes guidelines that manufacturers must comply to.
Image
www.clublexus.com

Solaraguy.com OG. ;)
Flipside909
SolaraGuy Supporter
SolaraGuy Supporter
 
Posts: 2725
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2001 5:00 pm
Location: California

Postby Flipside909 » Fri Oct 25, 2002 1:59 pm

SKYravefever wrote:
yanks0114 wrote: Just think about 55W blue halogen bulbs. It has the same wattage as OEM halogen bulbs (55W), but it does a terrible job at illuminating the road.

Here is a good resource on HIDs that I came across:
http://faq.auto.light.tripod.com/general-faq.htm


Especially the blue bulbs that claim higher wattage...that's nothing but a joke for real illumination. It's colored for asthetic purposes only...and really defies saftey.
Image
www.clublexus.com

Solaraguy.com OG. ;)
Flipside909
SolaraGuy Supporter
SolaraGuy Supporter
 
Posts: 2725
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2001 5:00 pm
Location: California

Postby Solara808 » Fri Nov 15, 2002 11:17 pm

I just got my HID kit installed for my car and i have the same problem. The lights come on once i release the handbrake as if the DRL was enabled. Someone please help me out, my connections seems to be fine so im stumped as to what it could be.

-Chris
Solara808
Just Licensed SolaraGuy
 
Posts: 38
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2002 7:59 pm
Location: Oahu, Hawaii

Solaraconvertable

Postby SolaraConvertable » Sun Nov 17, 2002 12:25 am

Hey Solara808, i had the same problem. My problem was that the balast box was placed in a location where it was touching ground so all we did was move it and the problem went away. Just dont let the metal of the box touch ground.
SolaraConvertable
Regular SolaraGuy Member
Regular SolaraGuy Member
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Newark, New Jersey

Postby Solara808 » Sun Nov 17, 2002 1:42 am

Thanks man, ill try it as soon as i get a chance and ill let you know how it turns out. :)

-Chris
Solara808
Just Licensed SolaraGuy
 
Posts: 38
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2002 7:59 pm
Location: Oahu, Hawaii
Previous

Return to Stock Gen 1 and 1.5

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests