[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 988: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Moscow' for 'MSD/4.0/DST' instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 988: getdate(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Moscow' for 'MSD/4.0/DST' instead
SolaraGuy.com • View topic - New 3.3 liter V-6!!
Stock talk about the Generation 1 and 1.5 Toyota Solara which were produced from 1999 to 2003.

New 3.3 liter V-6!!

New 3.3 liter V-6!!

Postby Chi Town Solara » Mon Jan 27, 2003 10:44 pm

Hey, does anybody know what Toyota is projecting to be the horsepower/Torque ratings for the new V-6 thats gonna go into the Solara?? Thanx
Chi Town Solara
 

Postby Peter » Mon Jan 27, 2003 11:25 pm

try the search function. search: solara 2004
Peter's "Black Sheep"
-1999 Toyota Solara SE V6 Black 5 Speed

Visit Black Sheep
Peter
Mod Alumni
Mod Alumni
 
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Jul 17, 2002 9:22 am
Location: Cypress, CA

Postby Jackass-Jeff » Mon Jan 27, 2003 11:32 pm

if it's exactly what they are dropping in the 04 sienna

240 hp 252 torque or something around that...
go to toyota.com and check out the new sienna... i'm sure its the same engine since they currently share one
1GR-FE ftw!
Jackass-Jeff
SolaraGuy Hall of Famer
SolaraGuy Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 6224
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 12:54 pm

Postby Flipside909 » Tue Jan 28, 2003 1:14 pm

xravexboix wrote:if it's exactly what they are dropping in the 04 sienna

240 hp 252 torque or something around that...
go to toyota.com and check out the new sienna... i'm sure its the same engine since they currently share one


Nope. 3MZ-FE VVT-i is only putting out 220hp for the RX330 and Sienna. I forgot what torque was.
Image
www.clublexus.com

Solaraguy.com OG. ;)
Flipside909
SolaraGuy Supporter
SolaraGuy Supporter
 
Posts: 2725
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2001 5:00 pm
Location: California

Postby _nkx1 » Tue Jan 28, 2003 1:26 pm

Damn, 220hp is weak. You'd think they would be able to squeeze a little more hp out of the 3.3, not to mention upping the hp of the 3.0 dohc engine. I mean, Honda was able to get 240hp from their 3.0 sohc engine, so I don't see why Toyota can't at least match that with the 3.3 or 3.0, especially since the 3.0 (and maybe the 3.3) is a dohc. I guess Toyota is just too conservative.
_nkx1
 

Postby Yanks0114 » Tue Jan 28, 2003 1:29 pm

_nkx1 wrote:Damn, 220hp is weak. You'd think they would be able to squeeze a little more hp out of the 3.3, not to mention upping the hp of the 3.0 dohc engine. I mean, Honda was able to get 240hp from their 3.0 sohc engine, so I don't see why Toyota can't at least match that with the 3.3 or 3.0, especially since the 3.0 (and maybe the 3.3) is a dohc. I guess Toyota is just too conservative.


I think they will get more out of it, but we'll see. It always seems like toyota has kept with their competition and they'll need to in order to stay on top. I can just see it now, "240hp honda accord tops carmy in sales for 2004"

LOL we'll see.
Yanks0114
SolaraGuy Moderator
SolaraGuy Moderator
 
Posts: 4756
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 12:01 am

Postby NASTY » Tue Jan 28, 2003 1:48 pm

Flipside909 wrote:3MZ-FE VVT-i is only putting out 220hp for the RX330 and Sienna. I forgot what torque was.


It's 230hp and 242 lbs of torque. unless canada's different?
'01 SLE V6
NASTY
SolaraGuy Supporter
SolaraGuy Supporter
 
Posts: 1273
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2002 10:44 am
Location: ON, Canada

Postby ICUFG » Tue Jan 28, 2003 2:41 pm

230hp. and 242ft.-lbs. of torque is correct.
ICUFG
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 279
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 11:45 am
Location: South Carolina

Postby Jaimster » Wed Jan 29, 2003 9:55 pm

You know what sucks? How can the new Altimas come with 3.5's. My girlfriend just got one, and she kicks my ass on acceleration. :x I hope Toyota can at least do better than 220HP for the 04's... cuz I hate trying to keep up with my chick on the freeway, but hey, I can at least turn quicker than her. :roll:
Yeah, I've owned 2 Solaras so.............................Image
Jaimster
Mod Alumni
Mod Alumni
 
Posts: 2116
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2001 5:00 pm
Location: NOHO... Biatch!!!

Postby Yanks0114 » Wed Jan 29, 2003 9:57 pm

On my moms maxima, same engine as the altima, it accelorates so quickly and smoothly, but your right, they have a horrible turning radius. I Hope toyota will keep up with the trend of high horsepower engines
Yanks0114
SolaraGuy Moderator
SolaraGuy Moderator
 
Posts: 4756
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 12:01 am

Postby Luc » Thu Jan 30, 2003 12:24 pm

_nkx1 wrote: mean, Honda was able to get 240hp from their 3.0 sohc engine


You have to take into consideration where in the RPM range does Honda measure their HP, since their low end torque is not good. It was the same thought as how the S2000 was rated, but at some high (8000) RPM. It would be great for Toyota to pump out more HP, but the people like us who are more performance geared are not the primary target. :-?

Luc
1998 S/C'd 1MZ-FE A/T
Luc
Regular SolaraGuy Member
Regular SolaraGuy Member
 
Posts: 209
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2002 9:27 pm
Location: IL

Postby SKYravefever » Thu Jan 30, 2003 12:59 pm

Even with power primarily at the top end, the S2000 nevertheless hauls a$$, and that's just half the equation. Factor in its handling characteristics, it's definately a thrill to drive. According to Temple of VTEC (yes, lame name, I know), the new V6 EX Auto dyno-ed in at ~196whp. Not too shabby, even if it's juice is on the top end. Take a look at the dyno here: http://www.vtec.net/articles/view-artic ... e_number=2 and you'll notice a fairly flat torque curve.
SKYravefever
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 285
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 11:15 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Postby Luc » Thu Jan 30, 2003 4:22 pm

I agree with you about the S2k's overall characteristics. Good find on that new Accord dyno-test, I'm impressed by the numbers it put out! I was just merely trying to point out every manufacturer, given this instance, Honda, plays the number game at their range just to get a higher HP value. So it's hard to judge a car just by looking at numbers.

Luc
1998 S/C'd 1MZ-FE A/T
Luc
Regular SolaraGuy Member
Regular SolaraGuy Member
 
Posts: 209
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2002 9:27 pm
Location: IL

Postby _nkx1 » Thu Jan 30, 2003 4:59 pm

I don't understand what you mean by Honda rating their engines at higher rpm's in order to obtain greater hp numbers. All engines produce a peak amount of horsepower, and they all vary in relation to what rpm's the engine produces that peak amount of horsepower. True, the Honda may have less torque than hp, but the bottom line is that the Honda 3.0 sohc produces 240hp, while the Toyota 3.0 dohc only produces 200hp. So why wouldn't Toyota also play the "numbers game" to gain a higher hp rating? It would be a poor business decision not to rate the engine at the highest hp possible for that engine. I think more accurate answer than the "numbers game" would be that either Toyota is somewhat conservative with engine design for whatever reason, or that Honda has the edge in getting the most hp from a relatively small engine.
_nkx1
 

Postby Flipside909 » Fri Jan 31, 2003 9:02 pm

_nkx1 wrote:I don't understand what you mean by Honda rating their engines at higher rpm's in order to obtain greater hp numbers. All engines produce a peak amount of horsepower, and they all vary in relation to what rpm's the engine produces that peak amount of horsepower. True, the Honda may have less torque than hp, but the bottom line is that the Honda 3.0 sohc produces 240hp, while the Toyota 3.0 dohc only produces 200hp. So why wouldn't Toyota also play the "numbers game" to gain a higher hp rating? It would be a poor business decision not to rate the engine at the highest hp possible for that engine. I think more accurate answer than the "numbers game" would be that either Toyota is somewhat conservative with engine design for whatever reason, or that Honda has the edge in getting the most hp from a relatively small engine.


Because of the way Honda designs their valve train, bore, stroke, cam gearing...and all of those little details...they are tuned to produce their peak horsepower at a higher RPM band. Any car maker can produce a high horsepower engine, but you need the right torque, and gearing to make it go fast. Toyota's V6's are much more torquey than it's Honda V6 counterparts due to the fact that Toyota designed it to have plenty of torque along with good fuel economy and performance. Toyota uses double overhead cams design whereas Honda uses only SOHC. If Toyota wanted to match their HP numbers, there would be no doubt in my mind that the Toyota V6's torque, with the technology used would net more torque than the Hondas. There are several factors in performance of an engine. Gearing, valve timing, cam gearing, and etc are big factors. You can have all the HP in the world, but you need torque to help move it along.
Image
www.clublexus.com

Solaraguy.com OG. ;)
Flipside909
SolaraGuy Supporter
SolaraGuy Supporter
 
Posts: 2725
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2001 5:00 pm
Location: California
Next

Return to Stock Gen 1 and 1.5

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests