First off: Honda should be emabarrased at the camparison between the auto Solara and the manual Accord. I mean, come on, the Solara is pushing 225 hp and 240 ft-lb of torque where the Accord is pushing just about the flip of the numbers, pushing 240 hp and 212 ft-lbs of torque. Our drivetrain loss in the Solara is unbelievable and competitive with the loss of a manual of another car brand. That is something to think about. A 6-speed manual on this Solara would be scary to say the least.
Secondly: I also test drove both cars. The Accord was $2000-$3000 more than the Solara, yet I couldn't figure out why. I mean, Toyota could of put a Lexus badge on it's Solara. I didn't feel that Accord could of put an Acura badge on this car. I felt that I was in a peppier 4 door Civic. The Solara felt nothing like a regular Camry, but had a touch of class and performance Toyota usually lacks. Toyota usually produces bland cars with hp numbers competive with a Ford Taurus and not the imports. The ride quality of the Solara was much more luxurios and comfortable. When I drove the Honda, I felt like I was driving a sports car and not a luxury or mid-sized sedan. The dash layout was subpar to say the least with no fancy trim or logical layout. Nothing about it wowed me like the Solara. The Honda looked like a rent-a-car with cheap plastic interior. The exterior styling is bland, like the Camry, yet as many of you have already said, doesn't get ripped for styling. Solara comes out with a sexy, curvy, daring, more aggressive, Lexus looking automobile, as per magazines request, and still get the cold shoulder. My honest opinion is that Honda is still getting their props from years of great engines and automobiles. I think that is where they have the audacity to have that $3,000 price difference. You are paying for past reputation and not neccessarily a better car. They were always a baby step above Toyota. I don't think they are today, I think they are closer than ever and cannot compare Mazda, Mitsubishi, Suziki, Hyundai, Kia, and any domestic. The only car company that I would say is competive to a Toyota or Honda but not quite there yet due to the longetivity of reputation is Nissan.
Secondly: I also test drove both cars. The Accord was $2000-$3000 more than the Solara, yet I couldn't figure out why. I mean, Toyota could of put a Lexus badge on it's Solara. I didn't feel that Accord could of put an Acura badge on this car. I felt that I was in a peppier 4 door Civic. The Solara felt nothing like a regular Camry, but had a touch of class and performance Toyota usually lacks. Toyota usually produces bland cars with hp numbers competive with a Ford Taurus and not the imports. The ride quality of the Solara was much more luxurios and comfortable. When I drove the Honda, I felt like I was driving a sports car and not a luxury or mid-sized sedan. The dash layout was subpar to say the least with no fancy trim or logical layout. Nothing about it wowed me like the Solara. The Honda looked like a rent-a-car with cheap plastic interior. The exterior styling is bland, like the Camry, yet as many of you have already said, doesn't get ripped for styling. Solara comes out with a sexy, curvy, daring, more aggressive, Lexus looking automobile, as per magazines request, and still get the cold shoulder. My honest opinion is that Honda is still getting their props from years of great engines and automobiles. I think that is where they have the audacity to have that $3,000 price difference. You are paying for past reputation and not neccessarily a better car. They were always a baby step above Toyota. I don't think they are today, I think they are closer than ever and cannot compare Mazda, Mitsubishi, Suziki, Hyundai, Kia, and any domestic. The only car company that I would say is competive to a Toyota or Honda but not quite there yet due to the longetivity of reputation is Nissan.
- mattyboyl
- SolaraGuy Driver
- Posts: 452
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 7:51 am
- Location: Philadelphia, PA