[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 988: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Moscow' for 'MSD/4.0/DST' instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file /viewtopic.php on line 988: getdate(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'Europe/Moscow' for 'MSD/4.0/DST' instead
SolaraGuy.com • View topic - MAX RPM before Rev Limit
Talk about aftermarket Toyota Solara Gen 1-1.5 upgrades.

MAX RPM before Rev Limit

Postby Paladin06Greg » Sun Jan 30, 2005 8:42 am

8) Not sure but my car is not intended to be a racing car. Its more like my pet project and a weekend show car. I only got the engine rebuilt because first off all I had killed the OEM one and second, because if someone does jump me going to or coming from a show I want them to go away saying "damn thing was pretty and fast".. 8)

DatSRBoi wrote:
Paladin06Greg wrote:I have a MSD DIS-4. It requires two adapters that MSD will provide. There is a switch in the SW1 set, there is also a SW2 and SW3 set, that allows you to extend your Rev limit. Although the book that came with the MSD indicated extending your RPM beyond the ECU set rev limit may not work in all cases, mine does.

Also know that my ECU has been modified by JetChip.


Dang you.. So what does it take to beat you? :drinking:
Paladin06Greg
Torqued Solara
Torqued Solara
 
Posts: 3056
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 2:19 pm
Location: East Valley AZ, USA

Postby DatSRBoi » Sun Jan 30, 2005 9:05 am

Ahaha I like your style.
[b][color=red]WARNING: MY SIGNATURE MAY CAUSE SEIZURES![/color][/b]
User avatar
DatSRBoi
Grumpy SolaraGuy
Grumpy SolaraGuy
 
Posts: 5411
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2004 5:33 pm
Location: DFW Texas

Postby TRD_solaRa » Sun Jan 30, 2005 10:06 am

I would have to agree wit DatSRBoi on the red-lining the car . . . if you ever want to have the best times on your 1/4 mile, (for manuals) I'd suggest pushing it right up to the redline and shift . . . takes some practice, but will definitely lead to the best times. I've tried it a bunch of different ways at the tracks and redline has proven the best. Shootz den.
TRD_solaRa
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 703
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2004 3:15 pm
Location: Northridge, CA & HI State

Postby 1jzgte » Sun Jan 30, 2005 1:23 pm

Anyone have a stock 1mzfe dyno chart? How about a S/C'd one? I just want to see the powerband for this engine.
1jzgte
Regular SolaraGuy Member
Regular SolaraGuy Member
 
Posts: 120
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 8:01 pm

Postby Mandarinsolara » Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:32 pm

why in the hell would you think its faster to shift at 5500? you might not have to worry about the little tiny slump off of power, but that puts you way under that fat torque at 4200. i bounce the rev limit almost ever shift,... in my auto lol... and im not kidding

i have seen my needle pull past the factory 6250, more like 6300 or a little more.

and on a built motor i dont see a problem in revs as long you got enough fuel to feed it. :lol: if i could figure out how to remove the limiter all together i would
Mandarinsolara
SolaraGuy Street Racer
SolaraGuy Street Racer
 
Posts: 1351
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 1:41 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Postby Alex(AUS) » Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:55 pm

Actually if I shift at 5500rpm second to third I hit 4000rpm (and the 'fat' torque curve). If I shift at 6500 (ie cutout) I miss the 'fat' curve all together :D .

BTW mine is a manual and I was refering to the manual ratios. Anyway, this wouldnt work in an auto (because it shifts on its own).

Alex
Alex(AUS)
Regular SolaraGuy Member
Regular SolaraGuy Member
 
Posts: 119
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2003 3:36 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Postby 1jzgte » Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:55 pm

Mandarinsolara wrote:why in the hell would you think its faster to shift at 5500? you might not have to worry about the little tiny slump off of power, but that puts you way under that fat torque at 4200. i bounce the rev limit almost ever shift,... in my auto lol... and im not kidding

i have seen my needle pull past the factory 6250, more like 6300 or a little more.

and on a built motor i dont see a problem in revs as long you got enough fuel to feed it. :lol: if i could figure out how to remove the limiter all together i would



ever heard of a powerband?
1jzgte
Regular SolaraGuy Member
Regular SolaraGuy Member
 
Posts: 120
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 8:01 pm

Postby Paladin06Greg » Sun Jan 30, 2005 5:06 pm

My auto does not always shift on it's own.. I like to shift it myself.

This getting alittle crazy. All ,I wanted to do was share some data and now it's starting to **** me off.

Thx all I'm signing off from this thread. 8)

Alex(AUS) wrote:Actually if I shift at 5500rpm second to third I hit 4000rpm (and the 'fat' torque curve). If I shift at 6500 (ie cutout) I miss the 'fat' curve all together :D .

BTW mine is a manual and I was refering to the manual ratios. Anyway, this wouldnt work in an auto (because it shifts on its own).

Alex
Paladin06Greg
Torqued Solara
Torqued Solara
 
Posts: 3056
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 2:19 pm
Location: East Valley AZ, USA

Postby Alex(AUS) » Sun Jan 30, 2005 5:11 pm

HUH? Whats wrong with you? I thought it was a constructive discussion ...

You cant shift an auto up if you have the foot to the floor if it thinks it too early ??? Also, as you know, you cant keep an auto in gear if it thinks it should shift down ...

Alex
Alex(AUS)
Regular SolaraGuy Member
Regular SolaraGuy Member
 
Posts: 119
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2003 3:36 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Postby swimshady906 » Sun Jan 30, 2005 11:59 pm

Alex(AUS) wrote:HUH? Whats wrong with you? I thought it was a constructive discussion ...

You cant shift an auto up if you have the foot to the floor if it thinks it too early ??? Also, as you know, you cant keep an auto in gear if it thinks it should shift down ...

Alex


I think greg's motor and tranny are a little different then most others ...
02' S2000 Silverstone
00' SE V6 Silverstream - sold :(

We race because Basketball, Baseball, Football and Soccer only require one ball.
swimshady906
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 561
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 6:02 pm

Postby Alex(AUS) » Mon Jan 31, 2005 5:09 am

I realise that. I am sure he has taken care of the transmission issues. However, I do remember him mentioning that he recently had problems on the dyno with the transmission. So I am assuming he couldnt keep it in gear ... as per my discussion ...

Alex
Alex(AUS)
Regular SolaraGuy Member
Regular SolaraGuy Member
 
Posts: 119
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2003 3:36 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Postby Mandarinsolara » Wed Feb 02, 2005 2:41 pm

1jzgte wrote:
Mandarinsolara wrote:why in the hell would you think its faster to shift at 5500? you might not have to worry about the little tiny slump off of power, but that puts you way under that fat torque at 4200. i bounce the rev limit almost ever shift,... in my auto lol... and im not kidding

i have seen my needle pull past the factory 6250, more like 6300 or a little more.

and on a built motor i dont see a problem in revs as long you got enough fuel to feed it. :lol: if i could figure out how to remove the limiter all together i would



ever heard of a powerband?


ya, but do you know what it is?
Mandarinsolara
SolaraGuy Street Racer
SolaraGuy Street Racer
 
Posts: 1351
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 1:41 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Postby lazyboyz69 » Wed Feb 02, 2005 10:39 pm

seems like red lining isn't the proper way to race.... anyone can redline their car, i think depending on cars like civics and integra with a higher redline than solaras and lower torque, you would have to redline the crap out of civic or integra because its mainly hp.. as for solaras and high torque cars with a short redline i think just short under redline is optimal so the torque can push it instead of hp....
5 spd v6 supercharged, TRD kit,TRD short shifter,TRD Rear Sway Bar,TRD Front Tie Bar,TRD Exhuast,Rear B&G Damper System, tien/tokcio front,18" Axis Seven,Walbro 190 fuel pump,
lazyboyz69
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 349
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 10:55 pm
Location: SO. CAL

Postby all_red » Thu Feb 03, 2005 12:46 am

think about this... when they build race cars, they tweak the cam so that redline can go as high as possible... there gotta be a reason for that!

I'm not saying higher redline is always better, but for most powerbands it is!

Torque comes in handy between shifts and when the gas pedal is pressed, but as soon as that happens, HP takes care of the rest. In other words, torque is needed to get over the moment of inertia of the parts. When the parts start rolling at a speed, torque is of no use!
5-speed V6.
TRD Supercharger.
TRD Short Throw Shifter.
Tokico/Eibach combo.
all_red
SolaraGuy Driver
SolaraGuy Driver
 
Posts: 593
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 11:28 am
Location: Tulsa, OK

Postby Alex(AUS) » Thu Feb 03, 2005 5:44 am

Makes sense. It is quite a good point.

However, lets put this in the equation as well. When I use a gtech meter the gforces that the car is pulling at (in any gear) peak and hold around 4.0 - 5.0krpm and go downhill from there. So the car is pulling hardest (accelerating fastest) at the peak torque not at peak power. Therefore, if you can be in the 4.0 - 5.0krpm longer and stay away from the rest you will accelerate faster. Therefore, I feel that if you shift around 5.5 - 5.7krpm (in a Supercharged 1MZ) you will accelerate fastest. What do you think?

Alex
Alex(AUS)
Regular SolaraGuy Member
Regular SolaraGuy Member
 
Posts: 119
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2003 3:36 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia
PreviousNext

Return to Aftermarket Gen1 and 1.5

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests